Many people today cannot make sense of church because the
way we think today is not the way we used to think. Many churches, most churches, still think in
one way; more and more people today think in another way. Many, many churches – including our own
heritage, the Churches of Christ – grew their structures and forged their
creedal identities in the seventeenth-and eighteenth-century thought world of Newton , Locke, Voltaire
and Hume:
committed to the pursuit of timeless, abstract, universal
truths that are true for all people in all times, regardless of context or
circumstance;
enthralled by science and accepting as true only those
“facts” that are scientifically verifiable; and
in quest of certitude and consequently having little
patience with mystery or diversity.
All this has been rigorously challenged in the past fifty
years by a kind of thought called Postmodernism.
“Postmodernism” means – drum roll, please – that that which
comes after modernism. The world of,
say, 1950 prided itself on being modern.
And there was some reason for pride.
Much had been learned from modern thought. There was a sense of having arrived, of
having arrived at ultimate truth. But a
number of thinkers kept thinking. They
thought of a world that had just survived two World Wars and the monstrous
ethnic-cleansing of the Holocaust, and was now split down Cold War lines and
threatened by nuclear annihilation.
(Good grief! Back in that day in school little kids like me were being drilled in “duck and cover.”) And they wondered if all this horrifying
conflict might not in some ways be explained by the modern pursuit of timeless,
abstract, universal truths; a purified Master Race, for instance, is just such
a concept, clinically rational, deadly wrong.
Maybe all the conflict, the turmoil, the violence, arose out of the very quest for certitude, the worship of
science and technology, and the disregard for context, circumstance, diversity
and the truths that are known best by the heart.
When Postmodernism crashed against the denominational
citadels of Christianity, it was largely seen as bad news. It created consternation. Churches molded by modernism sensed the real
threat in Postmodernism. Their
institutions were being scrutinized, as were many of their theological
certitudes. And many church leaders
circled their wagons and took aim at Postmodernism which drove them deeper into
decline.
But why? What if God
were offering us through new thought a fresh wind of the Spirit bringing life
back to the dry bones of the church, a world open to mystery, to awe and
wonder, to miracle, a world gloriously re-enchanted, life open to the sacred
all around us, minds surrounded by grace and with this consciousness being able
to see so much more than we ever could before?
And what if this might make possible all people one day coming together
in faith?
Having grown up with a "postmodernist" education in many ways it is hard for me to make the transition to seeing the "modernist" way of thought. Because of how much we are impacted by our experiences and how life can change so quickly it is hard for me to make sense of going on a quest for certitude and getting to an end with any real conviction. But there is certainly a sense to me in churches and other societal institutions of the importance of being correct, of being right and others being wrong; of having the answers, with the idea that the answers give you power or authority over those without them. The answers make you special and unique. But really, why is that important? This sense of certitude seems to provide a blanket of conviction to ease insecurity.
ReplyDeleteMaybe it comes down to what we hold on to in our core. If having to be right and correct is most important to us then postmodernist thought can breed fear and it seems like the fundamentalist reaction in many societies does seem like a "cornered" mentality. But if what we hold onto is a love, respect, tolerance, and understanding for all our neighbors that we can learn through our relationship with God then fear has no role to play.