One of the great
challenges for the church in our times is to make sense of life, yes, for
ourselves, but also for the many, many
people who have weighed religion in the scales and have found it wanting,
who seek compassion, decency, common sense and inclusiveness but who have not
found these things in churches, mosques and synagogues, who seek to make sense of a God they still believe in but whom they
struggle to find in religion as they have experienced it. Many, many people are tired of churches but they
throng to interpretive spaces, to interpretive centers, to interpretive
channels, to interpretive blogs and websites, to places that make sense of life
and origins and history and religion and doctrine.
How then might we,
as followers of Jesus and as church communities, make sense of life and make
sense of the world in which we live? It
begins naturally with making sense of what we know. What do we know and how do we know that we
know it? And on what basis can we feel
confident that what we think we know is truthful and squares with the way
things really are? In a world filled with new ideas, many of which challenge the ways
we’ve thought before, in a world filled with competing truth claims, in a world
filled with works of spiritual genesis that are not a part of our own faith
tradition, how do we make sense of what we know?
I will begin by tracing my own story. I, like many others, grew up in a universe
where everything was clear, exact and certain.
At least at first sight, and few looked deeper. You knew who you were, where you came from,
and where you were going. You knew what
was right and what was wrong. You knew
what was false and what was true. You even
knew who was saved and who was lost. In
fact, everyone and everything fit exactly into his, her or its own precise
category. Perhaps it is no surprise then
that I had a professor back in my
graduate studies in religion many years ago who would tell us that we could ask
him any question, any question at all about
anything, and given a little time, he could give us a book, chapter and verse answer from
Scripture. For anything. He might have to go off and think about it
for an hour or so, maybe a day or so – please
smile, though he seldom did – but given time, he could give a book-chapter-and-verse
answer to any question imaginable. And
it could be a question about anything: physics, biology, astronomy, any ethical
dilemma, certainly any doctrinal matter, or who to date, how to raise your children, or who to vote
for. For any question, he could find the
answer because after all had not Jesus promised us that when the Spirit of truth comes,
he will guide his apostles into all the truth?
So, he reasoned, the Spirit came and inspired Scripture – gave us the
Bible, and now we have this Scripture and it makes everything perfectly clear.
Even as he was
saying these things, however, I came to realize that things were not at all that
obvious to me or to most people. I came
to see on the basis of Scripture itself that there were many things that were not
clear, exact and certain. I began to read Scripture not through the
lens or filter of the eighteenth-century Enlightenment but as it was written – true
to its original intent and historical context. I began to read it with empathy for others as
Jesus did. I began to see that it was not primarily a law
code, that, yes, there were parts of it that were ancient law codes, but much
of it was narrative and poetry and prophetic oracle and literary
correspondence. Within it there is mystery, and within it there are multiple
perspectives. Within it, ideas
develop over time. Within in, there is dialectic,
that is, point and counter-point leading us to seek transcendent
principles. We are invited by Scripture
to wrestle with a God who is simply I AM, I AM WHO I AM, beyond words and
beyond category. And I learned all this
as a follower of Jesus who asks me to open my heart and my mind to others, to
others who are very different from me, who gives me this Golden Rule, that I
should do to others what I would have them do to me. So I
learned to respect others and to seek to understand them. And I
learned all this as one who has come to see that God is, in fact, love.
As someone who has attended a variety of church services and heard a variety of ministers it has always been a bit bizarre that I've heard more people talking about fearing God and cosmic battles with "evil" than I've heard talking about the unconditional love of God. And maybe that's because people want to believe that they alone are right and they alone are unique holders of the "Truth." It comes across to me though as a real sense of insecurity. I believe through more reflection (self and communal) on our own experiences we would come closer to a more inclusive interpretation of the world.
ReplyDelete